Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3450 3,425 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 89.9 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 107 57% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 222 24% 193 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 21F9) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 13.8 12% 13.6 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 17 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 186 17 53 57 61 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 182 Write 191 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 87.7 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston termiter 2x4GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.6 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16