Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 158 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 350 35% 285 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% HP(103C 1630) ≥ 4GB CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 16.2 12% 14.7 fps	MRender 17.9 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 16.4 13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 893GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 439 351 363 366 365 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 369 Write 426 Mixed 357 SusWrite 380 87% 383 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 36.8 117% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 300 237% 329 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	234x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	37x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
PM830 256GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,468 samples	12x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	10x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $284

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16