Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B23
Motherboard	MSI B360M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B23) (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190221
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '20 at 15:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 79.7 1-Core 138 2-Core 276 89% 164 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 747 81% 643 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.7 39% 49.1 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 62.2 49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB 44,418 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 434 431 434 277 262 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 451 Mixed 433 SusWrite 377 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 45.5 152% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 291 237% 338 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 98GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 309 300 307 303 312 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 462 Mixed 384 SusWrite 321 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 52.4 176% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 353 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 189 188 189 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 180 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 187 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.5 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 21.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	28x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	12x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	11x
SU800NS38 128GBAdataBench 74%, 7,443 samples	10x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 23,313 samples	18x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	15x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	14x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16