Asus P5QLD PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5QLD PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '17 at 22:02
Run Duration	622 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 81.2 45% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 161 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% PwrHis(1787 2328) 2GB CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Lighting 32.6 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 30.2 26% 29.4 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 36.9 27% 32.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 7100217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 -7481833017949 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 464 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 69 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7100217 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7100217 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7100217 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11172 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7463 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7463 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6909	37.9% Below average	Read 185 Write 96.3 Mixed 117 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 16.6 74% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 93.9 DQ Mixed 29.5 30% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 687GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 129 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 76 68 7285 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4294 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 29191 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2380 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 406 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 44 240518889503 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 70 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4328	76% Very good	Read 124 Write 141 Mixed 76.1 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.39 95% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 106GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 89 62419880 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 470 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 72165426 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11581 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 470 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1588 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 522059807 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 60751 (C2) HDA temperature 31 46 51539607583 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 99 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -128900558480141 (F1) Unknown 100 253 34593069751 (F2) Unknown 100 253 110488525992	81% Excellent	Read 158 Write 125 Mixed 24.8 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.15 67% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 113%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 817 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Read 9.68 Write 3.09 Mixed 4.84 6% 5.87 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.008 16% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1f00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Read 15.1 Write 3.88 Mixed 5.61 8% 8.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QLD PRO Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QLD PRO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	6x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	3x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	3x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
VERTEX3 60GBOCZBench 60%, 3,574 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	13x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $132

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16