Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 00:34
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 351
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 42.2
33% 38.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 36.6
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 239 114 36 59 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69% Good
Read 438
Write 342
Mixed 341
SusWrite 117
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 26
107% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 29.1
89% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69%
Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
18GB free
Firmware: 600A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 92 91 89 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 234
Write 126
Mixed 172
SusWrite 90.1
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 31.4
110% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 95.2
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 27.9
44% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
112GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 98 90 85 100 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.8% Above average
Read 221
Write 123
Mixed 132
SusWrite 93
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 28.7
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 17.5
51% 111 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 81%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 167 174 173 171 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 174
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 160
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
612GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 48.8
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 34.2
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
908GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 75.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 23.9
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 23 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 82.8
Write 47.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 23.2
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
521GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 90
Write 83.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 81.2
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
770GB free
Firmware: 50.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 114 114 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 113
Write 111
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 113
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 59%
Qnap Storage 107GB
65GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 14 18 19 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 63.8
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 17.6
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.3
724% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%
Qnap Storage 43GB
40GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 41 47 45 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
Read 80.5
Write 76.3
Mixed 79
SusWrite 43.8
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4
678% 3.83 MB/s
Qnap iSCSI Storage 429GB
400GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.3 6.5 7.4 7.4 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 21
Write 20.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 6.5
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3
536% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 53%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 275GB
66GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.8 7.6 6.1 6 6.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.48% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 19.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 6.8
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.6
369% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 26%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 666GB
443GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5 5.5 5.3 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.57% Terrible
Read 20
Write 13.8
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 5.3
10% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.4 MB/s
Qnap iSCSI Storage 644GB
423GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 16.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 9.6
14% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 49%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 537GB
471GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 22
Mixed 23
SusWrite 5.3
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 59%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 215GB
39GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.5 5.6 6.6 6.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 24
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 6.3
12% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback