Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '17 at 18:10
Run Duration	556 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 143 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 395 41% 329 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Palit(1569 11C6) 1GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.8 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 21.2 14% 18.4 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 15.2 15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3 SATA M.2 120GB-$128 1,644 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17478 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 577 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (AA) Unknown 100 100 362 (AD) Unknown 100 100 50463585 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 55174 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 24567 (F2) Unknown 100 100 28373 (F4) Unknown 100 100 770 (F5) Unknown 100 100 865 (F6) Unknown 100 100 27588544	35.5% Below average	Read 244 Write 15.9 Mixed 248 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 9 78% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 9.05 22% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 82%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 305GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 136 (03) Spinup time 198 176 5091 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2462 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18457 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 645 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 163 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 114 114 260208 (C2) HDA temperature 121 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.9% Very good	Read 141 Write 113 Mixed 106 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.17 76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 83%
Samsung HD082GJ 80GB-$23 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 59GB free Firmware: JE100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4352 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5312 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 41579 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2172 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 101294838 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 160 106 738394138 (C2) HDA temperature 160 103 755171354 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 101294838 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	42.3% Average	Read 71.7 Write 75.7 Mixed 69.4 54% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.39 97% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 42%
Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 3GB free, PID 6213 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 2.71 Mixed 4.18 6% 6.23 MB/s	4K Read 3.45 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.17 22% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16