HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	4.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	18.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '20 at 06:58
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 5,111 User benchmarks, average bench 48% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 80.5 43% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 144 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1546) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.6% Average	Lighting 53.7 Reflection 51 Parallax 44.6 44% 49.8 fps	MRender 41.3 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 47.7 37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 189 225 233 239 237 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 179 Write 100 Mixed 83 SusWrite 220 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 10.9 45% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 137 88% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:85 02 PSD34G13332 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:85 02 PSD34G13332 48GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.6% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	53x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	90x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	20x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:01 98 K1N7HK-HYC 48GBUnknownBench 19%, 8 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 38GBUnknownBench 20%, 147 samples	5x
ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GBUnknownBench 19%, 31 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16