Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 16:46
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 146
2-Core 263
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,130
99% 840 Pts
64-Core 2,046
127% 2,046 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 60.1
49% 62.7 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 53.9
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,092
Write 1,707
Mixed 1,181
368% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 60.3
201% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,006
750% 998 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
279GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 518 522 607 525 520 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 614
Write 518
Mixed 491
SusWrite 525
121% 537 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.4
226% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 912
628% 776 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 353%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
140GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 43 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 59.1
27% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
333GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 54.3
Write 51
Mixed 47
SusWrite 90.4
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 23.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $847
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback