Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 655 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 33 Parallax 29.7 27% 31.8 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 30.7 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 303 292 286 283 280 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 462 Mixed 438 SusWrite 294 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 61.6 204% 72.8 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 317 240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 849GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 187 186 184 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 182 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 185 107% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 16,202 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	540x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	222x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16