Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Q87M-E (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141017
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '20 at 07:31
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 406 54% 403 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 100 Parallax 184 98% 135 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 110 Splatting 138 97% 115 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asus DRW-24B5ST 500GB 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 257 Write 396 Mixed 119 189% 258 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 20.8 4,830% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 153 1,640% 206 MB/s

Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 70GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 78 78 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 86.5 Write 68 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 79.1 52% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.3 222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 385GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 23 21 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 14.5 Write 64.8 Mixed 1 SusWrite 24.6 19% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 62%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 476GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 136 136 138 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 95.7 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 136 70% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2 375% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.9 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	228x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	186x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	135x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	104x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	45x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	49x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16