Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 23:18
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 119
55% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 259
29% 228 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 61.1
57% 66.5 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 55.6
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 179 139 73 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 342
Write 310
Mixed 310
SusWrite 118
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 33.5
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 201
156% 214 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 121%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 181 220 279 278 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 357
Write 338
Mixed 330
SusWrite 234
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 41.3
133% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 210
161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
159GB free, PID 2321
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 68
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 76.2
83% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback