PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
Graphics | 38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | ECS GeForce6100PM-M2 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100604 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '20 at 22:20 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom 9500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
15.4%
Very poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom 9350e Quad-CoreAMDBench 43%, 168 samples | 4x |
Sempron 140AMD $9Bench 35%, 2,532 samples | 2x |
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples | 12x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 3x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 4% - Terrible | Total price: $102 |