EVGA 131-GT-E767

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 131-GT-E767 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100630
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 136 61% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 293 31% 250 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 86.1 Reflection 78.7 Parallax 80.2 70% 81.7 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 75 Splatting 71 68% 85.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 61 75 70 71 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 132 Write 208 Mixed 174 SusWrite 67.5 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 24.7 70% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 32.2 28% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 111%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 465GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 80 71 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 78 Write 75 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 72.4 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 144GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 97 96 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 93 Write 98.5 Mixed 54 SusWrite 96.4 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 131-GT-E767 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 131-GT-E767

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	37x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	11x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	7x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	24x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	12x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16