| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar TB250-BTC (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20170503 |
| Uptime | 13.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 11 '20 at 17:00 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | LKA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.1%
Good
|
64% 109 Pts
|
44% 326 Pts
|
20% 320 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
24% 28.2 fps
|
29% 35.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 110 117 124 139 134 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
67% 300 MB/s
|
136% 49.4 MB/s
|
173% 282 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
217GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 100 95 100 98 100 MB/s
|
69.8%
Good
|
81% 111 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
48% 84.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TB250-BTC Builds (Compare 580 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar TB250-BTC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 72x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 51x |
| Celeron G3930Intel $20Bench 48%, 9,606 samples | 50x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 92x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 52x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $226 |