bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DP43TF
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '20 at 14:49
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 54.1 1-Core 13 2-Core 31.8 25% 33 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 64.3 9% 67.1 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.24 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 6 4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 84 80 90 108 138 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 162 Write 164 Mixed 144 SusWrite 105 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 8 33% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 16.6 12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 60%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 121GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 69 68 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 99.8 Write 46.5 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 68 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 62%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 10GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 7.8 7.9 5.3 6.7 7.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.14% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 6.8 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,019x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,563x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	930x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,038x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16