Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '20 at 08:04
Run Duration	564 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 830 78% 647 Pts	64-Core 950 59% 950 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 235 Parallax 247 169% 230 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 218 Splatting 146 162% 206 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,490 Write 1,137 Mixed 837 256% 1,155 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 55 200% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 391 DQ Mixed 496 372% 500 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Kingshar KS-ANTU28K 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 42GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 110 133 133 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.1% Below average	Read 346 Write 38.3 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 116 30% 140 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 11.4 52% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 18.4 DQ Mixed 21.3 26% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 50%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 26GB free Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 196 193 147 142 143 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 451 Write 193 Mixed 228 SusWrite 170 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 15.7 102% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 29.4 49% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 72%
WD FILEIO 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 467GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 82 82 87 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 27% Great: 45%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 256GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 195GB free, PID a840 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 131 Mixed 30.2 68% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.3 94% 3 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 36%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 64GB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 56GB free, PID 16a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 7.9 7 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 9 19% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.4 96% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 26%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 40GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 3.7 6.6 3 5.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 20.8 Write 2.2 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 4.6 10% 9.45 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 41% 3.65 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
I-O DATA USB DISK 126GB 114GB free, PID 0154 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.1% Very poor	Read 36 Write 29 Mixed 29 SusWrite 27.6 40% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.8 86% 2.03 MB/s

SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 10GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 7.1 7.3 7.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 141 Write 47.5 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 23.8 73% 66 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.2 184% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 36%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 54GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 0.4 6.9 5.8 6.9 6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 22.5 Write 5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 5.3 11% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 41% 3.65 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
Lexar microSD RDR 128GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 116GB free, PID b051 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 7.2 8.4 6.8 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.84% Terrible	Read 37 Write 31.5 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 8.4 29% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.84% Great: 45%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 112GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 99.5 Write 87.5 Mixed 69.8 106% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.4 90% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 112GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.7 9 9.3 9.2 9.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 19.8 Write 17.5 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 9.2 21% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 5.3 383% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 112GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.8 8.5 9.7 9.3 9.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	Read 17.7 Write 16.5 Mixed 17 SusWrite 9.1 20% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 5.2 383% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 112GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9 9.6 9.3 9.7 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 18.5 Write 16.5 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 9.5 20% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 5.2 382% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%
USB3.0 USB DISK 3.0 126GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 112GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.4 0.9 5.3 3.8 4.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.2 Write 33.5 SusWrite 3.9 24% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 29%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 112GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 30 20 19 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	30% Poor	Read 121 Write 68.7 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 27.4 92% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.9 139% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 36%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 112GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.4 8.5 8.3 7.9 7.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 37 Write 25 Mixed 28 SusWrite 8.4 31% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 8 566% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 254GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 110GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 20.5 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 18.7 28% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.9 179% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 30%
Monster OD3.0 MINI SSD 253GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 106GB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 143 145 115 131 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 208 Write 89.7 Mixed 72 SusWrite 136 154% 126 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 96% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB 2,131 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 105GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 2.9 4.3 2.7 4.3 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	7.3% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 15 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 4 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.3% Great: 16%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 86GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 136 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 183 Write 133 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 135 174% 135 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 52%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 77GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 4.3 6.2 6.5 6 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 5 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3133 MHz clocked @ 1567 MHz Performing below potential (85^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 36.4 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.8 SC Write 41.2 SC Mixed 32 95% 33.3 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)