Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 521 295 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 68.7 38% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 76.5 8-Core 80.9 10% 78.7 Pts	64-Core 73.5 4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 2,864 User benchmarks, average bench 17% XFX(1682 9550) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 24.7 16% 24.6 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 30 21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
256gb QLC SATA SSD 256GB 940 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0918A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 106 8.2 56 3.5 41 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 190 Write 177 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 50.4 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 0.5 22% 7.1 MB/s	DQ Read 65 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 0.6 10% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 145GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 94 110 93 115 116 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 107 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 152GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 156 164 157 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 157 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 158 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 16GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1065TAMDBench 55%, 1,141 samples	5x
Phenom II X2 521AMDBench 44%, 295 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	2x

SSD
NE O N400 SSD 240GBKlevvBench 37%, 1 sample	2x
512GSQ 512GBYssdjqb-Bench 52%, 4 samples	2x
0 250GBCt250mx5Bench 89%, 930 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 252 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16