Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-031B6874CF7F642A
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170329
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 04:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570R
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 101
49% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 145
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Apple(106B 0122) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 11
5% 8.58 fps
MRender 9.86
Gravity 3.73
Splatting 9.22
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 44 45 49 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 72.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 45.5
39% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 22.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,1 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback