| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B365M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191010 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 11 '20 at 00:33 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.1%
Very good
|
79% 141 Pts
|
59% 467 Pts
|
29% 467 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
65.9%
Good
|
66% 75.5 fps
|
65% 80.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253X1240G 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 313 347 137 68 70 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
72% 320 MB/s
|
90% 35.6 MB/s
|
86% 173 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
240GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 149 151 151 151 MB/s
|
73.2%
Very good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
188% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
63.4%
Good
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
47% 84.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,283 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,617x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 477x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 417x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 354x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 336x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 275x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $444 |