Mousecomputer W110ER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMousecomputer W110ER  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer W110ER
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120402
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 07:08
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 162
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 411
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 1150) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.97 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX910 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 509
Write 152
Mixed 222
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 11.3
74% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 10.6
18% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53%
Great: 83%
Lacie Rikiki USB 3.0 500GB
368GB free
Firmware: 1053
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 27.8
Mixed 28.7
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.29
92% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EL74C1D167HZ1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback