Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$144
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 896
88% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 140
Parallax 149
117% 144 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 124
Splatting 103
105% 132 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 2158 1495 1102 1097 1134 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2,262
Mixed 1,576
SusWrite 1,380
432% 1,929 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.6
257% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 965
724% 980 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 308%
Great: 372%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
16GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 75 107 49 61 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 352
Write 226
Mixed 149
SusWrite 80.4
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 31.7
131% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 163
144% 223 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 101%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
132GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 143 174 174 173 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 488
Mixed 401
SusWrite 219
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 39.5
147% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 204
188% 288 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
466GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 120
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 131 132 130 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65% Good
Read 96
Write 125
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 130
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 21.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 1,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback