Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.86% Terrible	Memory 12.9 1-Core 9.8 2-Core 17.3 8% 13.3 Pts	4-Core 27.3 8-Core 33.2 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 14.2 1% 14.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 058B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.34 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 2.48 1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 128GB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM12D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 149 142 129 133 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 324 Write 219 Mixed 176 SusWrite 145 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 7.1 25% 8.53 MB/s	DQ Read 99.2 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 82.5 61% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HT5SMRAP 2x2GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.5 GB/s	Latency 377 11% 377 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	58x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	18x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	9x
SM841 mSATA 512GBSamsungBench 73%, 519 samples	4x

RAM
HT5SMRAP 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 415 samples	36x
HT5SMRAP 2x2GBHynixBench 48%, 155 samples	12x
M7B23H-K 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 92 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16