Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '20 at 07:54
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 96.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 242 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 942 83% 706 Pts	64-Core 893 55% 893 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 152 Parallax 129 114% 140 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 136 Splatting 111 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 389GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 324 397 394 396 396 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 468 Mixed 356 SusWrite 370 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 44.5 150% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 275GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 325 401 396 397 398 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 468 Mixed 392 SusWrite 373 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 45.1 148% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 100GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 325 400 395 397 398 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 471 Mixed 393 SusWrite 372 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 45.5 152% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 355 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 3,288 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 124GB free Firmware: BXW74H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 646 653 642 649 625 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,504 Write 823 Mixed 750 SusWrite 647 207% 931 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 53.1 199% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,208 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 438 410% 661 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 237%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 100GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 463 468 466 467 467 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 469 Mixed 377 SusWrite 467 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 45.4 150% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668 2,601 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 1TB free Firmware: R0427A SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 454 462 461 461 461 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 456 Mixed 393 SusWrite 460 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 40.1 134% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 304 244% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 127%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB 1,092 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	MC Read 57.5 MC Write 61.9 MC Mixed 53.5 165% 57.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 22.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 51.4 78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	56x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	52x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	43x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 122%, 173 samples	17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 1,053 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 6,789 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $968

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)