Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '20 at 07:34
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 224 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 571 57% 466 Pts	64-Core 628 39% 628 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.13% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 8.66 6% 9.17 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 6.63 Splatting 15.7 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.13% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.5% Average	Lighting 47.1 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 43.7 38% 48.3 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 60.3 48% 58 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 558 535 507 491 474 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1848 Write 1,670 Mixed 1,160 SusWrite 545 292% 1,306 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 73.9 244% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,172 DQ Write 1,040 DQ Mixed 1,108 830% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 296%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 426GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 456 456 456 455 453 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 450 Mixed 412 SusWrite 455 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 51.8 168% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 346 260% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 25.8 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16