| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B84 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) (all builds) |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 10 '20 at 00:17 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.6%
Very good
|
82% 147 Pts
|
66% 543 Pts
|
42% 676 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7B84) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
19% 24.5 fps
|
17% 20.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 273 130 264 212 196 MB/s
|
94.9%
Outstanding
|
91% 406 MB/s
|
147% 54.8 MB/s
|
191% 299 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
218GB free
Firmware: 1AC01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 85 86 85 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
59% 79.6 MB/s
|
187% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
98.2%
Outstanding
|
100% 34.9 GB/s
|
94% 33 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 574 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 121x |
| Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-CoreAMDBench 71%, 10,689 samples | 75x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $285 |