Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$99 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 38.7 32% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 45 8-Core 36.5 6% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 39.5 2% 39.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(A0A0 0802) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M3 64GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 58 67 81 79 48 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.2% Below average	Read 115 Write 91 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 67.1 20% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 18 64% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 46.2 DQ Mixed 29.5 24% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 62GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.4 2.7 4 0 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.42% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 5.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 5.4 11% 10 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 38% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.42% Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7.7 8.6 6.6 7.7 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.47% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 7.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 7.7 12% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2 125% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.A2GC9.AF0 2x2GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM 4915 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	1x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	4x

SSD
TS128GSSD230S 128GBTranscendBench 83%, 2,263 samples	1x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x

RAM
78.A2GC9.AF0 2x2GBApacerBench 23%, 9 samples	2x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GBSamsungBench 38%, 66 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16