Lenovo 90L300FEMH

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90L300FEMH (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3704
Memory	4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200220
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '20 at 17:11
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 200 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 440 47% 375 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Zotac(19DA C520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82% Excellent	Lighting 95.1 Reflection 94.1 Parallax 104 78% 97.8 fps	MRender 169 Gravity 91.5 Splatting 85.8 91% 116 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB 12,020 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4M2QEXF7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 709 696 683 668 639 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,500 Write 1,224 Mixed 1,048 SusWrite 718 251% 1,123 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 46.1 146% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 688 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 613 458% 612 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 347%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 90GB free Firmware: 0637 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 80.1 Write 61.5 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 88.9 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 9,970 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.7% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 22 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90L300FEMH Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 73%

Battleship

System: Lenovo 90L300FEMH

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	5x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x

RAM
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $612

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16