QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 11:26
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
95% 169 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 786
86% 667 Pts
64-Core 748
50% 748 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 317
Reflection 298
Parallax 366
83% 327 fps
MRender 277
Gravity 311
Splatting 189
89% 259 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 118%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 225GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,878
Write 3,167
Mixed 3,413
2,864% 3,819 MB/s
4K Read 77.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 72.4
11,889% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 570
5,288% 584 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 30.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $624
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback