PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME X299-A (all builds) |
Memory | 19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200207 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 09 '20 at 09:50 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,579
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
7.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SQ500S37960G 960GB
527GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 86 31 74 37 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
399GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 152 138 153 145 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 3.9 7.3 5.6 4.2 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $236Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 372x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 214x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $400Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 148x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 192x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 90x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 82x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $819 |