MSI MS-1792

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 2QC
MotherboardMSI MS-1792  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 08:18
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 517
55% 428 Pts
64-Core 509
34% 509 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$44
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 414 415 414 413 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 465
Write 391
Mixed 253
SusWrite 414
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 16.8
87% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 110
121% 199 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 129 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 129
71% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/4G MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-1792 Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback