Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 04:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 770
77% 624 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 112
Parallax 94.8
83% 103 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 98.7
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 130 50 49 60 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 620
Write 345
Mixed 420
SusWrite 96.7
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 47.7
175% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 31
35% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 107%
Sandisk SD8SBBU120G1122 120GB
34GB free
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 75 84 76 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 348
Write 76.8
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 79.3
31% 143 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 16.1
89% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 30.8
49% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 141
Write 130
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 134
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.3
259% 2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 26.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback