Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Memory 5.78 1-Core 6.1 2-Core 12.1 5% 7.99 Pts	4-Core 15.5 8-Core 16.1 2% 15.8 Pts	64-Core 15.6 1% 15.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0690) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.72 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 29 61 48 50 98 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.8% Very poor	Read 84.9 Write 71.3 Mixed 59 SusWrite 65 16% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 3.9 14% 5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 1x4GB 3,468 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	4.77% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.57 GB/s	Latency 445 9% 445 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 58 samples	2x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16