Lenovo 20EVA04200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EVA04200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EVA04200
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 02:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 255
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5049) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.72
6% 7.71 fps
MRender 0.14
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 14.2
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 127 160 170 149 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 271
Write 251
Mixed 258
SusWrite 158
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 28.2
110% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 192
155% 215 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback