Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 54 2-Core 108 43% 72.1 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 168 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 066B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 4.77 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 4.75 4% 5.38 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 10 6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LJT-128L6G-11 M.2 2260 128GB 580 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: DJ7110D SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 296 291 298 299 301 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 375 Write 303 Mixed 241 SusWrite 296 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 13.6 51% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 144 130% 197 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix C8CDD4B4B2B5D3B6C1C6D2B6C1ADD0C2A0A0 2x2GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 14.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 146 28% 146 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	86x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	26x
LJH-128V2G-11 M.2 2260 128GBLiteonBench 57%, 138 samples	19x
LJH-256V2G-11 M.2 2260 256GBLiteonBench 70%, 129 samples	14x

RAM
A0B4CDD4C6B2B5B6B6B4C8DAADB1C7B6C5B1 2x2GBMicronBench 44%, 138 samples	20x
C8CDD4B4B2B5D3B6C1C6D2B6C1ADD0C2A0A0 2x2GBHynixBench 44%, 162 samples	17x
808080808080808080808080808080808080 2x4GBHynixBench 44%, 118 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16