HP ProBook 440 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 440 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837B
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 08:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 89.8
40% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 256
27% 211 Pts
64-Core 246
16% 246 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 26.1
6% 27 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 37.7
7% 27.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002YXM1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.5
Mixed 32
25% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProBook 440 G5 Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 440 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback