Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M4A785TD-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100723
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '20 at 00:23
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B50 3,245 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 51.7 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 77.5 31% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 83A2) 1,008MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.660.0.0 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.41 1% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.83 1% 1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 816GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 145 149 154 150 160 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Above average	Read 210 Write 192 Mixed 193 SusWrite 152 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 29 95% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.7 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 52.7 43% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3GB free Firmware: MX6O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 20.8 63% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 66GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 62.8 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 66.1 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 230GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 82 83 83 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 140 Write 92.5 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 82.1 71% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 149 155 149 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 182 Mixed 38 SusWrite 151 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 107%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 185GB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 35 34 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 49 Write 83 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 34.2 76% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 164% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 6TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 33 34 34 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 92.3 Write 104 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 34 94% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 195% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 19GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 35 34 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 88.8 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 34.5 85% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 177% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 75%
ASMT 2105 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 34 35 34 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 109 Write 111 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 34.6 100% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 38%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 482GB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 34 34 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 79.8 Write 94 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 34.6 72% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.6 259% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 89%
ST916031 0AS 160GB 146GB free, PID 201d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 34 34 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	Read 60 Write 55.3 Mixed 30 SusWrite 33.9 58% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.67 MB/s

ASMT 2115 120GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 23.3 Write 21 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 12.1 26% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 4.7 337% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 162%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 349GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23 Write 3.5 Mixed 13.5 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 9GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 23.3 Write 20.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 12.1 26% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 3.6 287% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A785TD-V EVO Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	37x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	22x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	17x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	18x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	12x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	4x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	29x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	28x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16