Acer Predator G3-710

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3-710 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3-710(KBL)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161208
Uptime	14.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 199 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 448 51% 400 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Sapphire(174B 1071) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.7% Below average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 16.6 42% 29 fps	MRender 24.2 Gravity 19.7 Splatting 18.3 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 200 232 188 134 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 409 Write 254 Mixed 199 SusWrite 184 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 18.9 77% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 182 171% 270 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 144GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 89 99 97 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 116 Write 153 Mixed 38 SusWrite 93.9 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 7,552 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 18.7 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 15.2 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-710 Builds (Compare 2,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: Acer Predator G3-710

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	986x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	724x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	679x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	747x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	312x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	292x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	120x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	102x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	170x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	168x
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 72%, 756 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16