Asus M2N-X Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M2N-X Plus (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071023
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-2060 AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.8% Average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 83 46% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 44.2 8-Core 44.4 6% 44.3 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Zotac(19DA 2263) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.02 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.91% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 11.8 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 13 10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mtfddak1 28MAM-1J1 128GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 213 Write 126 Mixed 121 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 15.4 88% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 17 27% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 67%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 174GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 78 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 91.7 Write 99.2 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 76.3 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 59%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 61GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 67 69 70 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 68.9 Write 55 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 65.5 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 79%
Generic External 1TB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 505GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 95 93 109 91 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 14.8 Write 31.4 Mixed 21 SusWrite 91 60% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 4.6 758% 7.97 MB/s	DQ Read 2.4 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 7.2 801% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 63%
ASMT 2105 128GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 10GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 112 165% 132 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 13.7 1,196% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 29.5 DQ Mixed 20.9 1,781% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 190%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 9.3 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.2 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M2N-X Plus Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2N-X Plus

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+AMDBench 31%, 2,693 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus M2N-X Plus

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus M2N-X Plus

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)