PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Ztsystem CYPRESS11 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel S2600CP |
Memory | 61.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20170324 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 07 '20 at 13:38 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 110 5.3 72 63 35 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
56GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 1x |
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 3x |
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $340 |