Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 731 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 86.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 694 75% 593 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 19 93 49 51 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 448 Write 326 Mixed 208 SusWrite 76.8 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 13.6 68% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 69.4 DQ Mixed 32 40% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 55%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 55GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 322 319 323 325 323 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 465 Write 325 Mixed 274 SusWrite 322 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 23.1 95% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 132 112% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 380GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 111 117 113 117 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 61.5 Write 40.8 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 110 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 375GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 140 139 138 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 134 Write 101 Mixed 72 SusWrite 138 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$51 7,248 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	444x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	225x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16