Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 12:22
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 917 82% 693 Pts	64-Core 1278 79% 1278 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0505) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1305 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 70.5 20% 42.6 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 54.8 Splatting 55.5 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 122 123 125 113 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 484 Mixed 394 SusWrite 157 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 51.6 170% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 60GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 63 54 54 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 478 Mixed 419 SusWrite 97.5 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 50.2 169% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 229 209% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 118%
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 85GB free Firmware: 5.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 132 136 136 136 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 186 Write 116 Mixed 131 SusWrite 138 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 19.3 70% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.8 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 47.4 40% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55 8,365 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 103GB free Firmware: SM12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 75 74 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 76.1 Write 75 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 73.1 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55 8,365 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 23GB free Firmware: SM12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 75 70 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 65.2 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 74.1 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 63%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 110 119 107 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 113 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 111 68% 93 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB 5,197 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 31.6 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 38.4 SC Mixed 26.5 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)