Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 832
82% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.91
4% 4.79 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 312 268 265 268 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,050
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 403
216% 969 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 74.5
253% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 784
594% 788 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 193%
Great: 223%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
880GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 81 80 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 85
Write 94
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 80.5
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 119 116 115 118 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 115
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 126 128 126 128 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 124
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 135 136 139 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 152
Write 124
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 34.3
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback