Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 11:07
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 42.1
30% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 55.2
6% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 69.7
4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 48.3
18% 28.4 fps
MRender 51.3
Gravity 62
Splatting 57.6
47% 57 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 122 180 197 179 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 429
Write 378
Mixed 353
SusWrite 194
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 34.9
109% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 137
108% 151 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 113%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
24GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 113 159 175 154 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 373
Write 181
Mixed 238
SusWrite 159
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 14.3
57% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 83.5
62% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
191GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 56 69 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 61.4
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 66.9
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback