Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Memory 26.3 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 19.3 15% 20.5 Pts	4-Core 24.1 8-Core 31.4 4% 27.8 Pts	64-Core 25.2 2% 25.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C648) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.76 fps	MRender 0.67 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1 0% 0.61 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KUZUK-120GB 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 151 175 184 148 147 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 199 Write 136 Mixed 190 SusWrite 157 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 10.7 38% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 72.2 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 38.7 37% 58 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.B346G.C280C Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 6GB 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.71% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 3.3 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 277 14% 277 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
N18A 480GBSSDBench 71%, 72 samples	9x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 25%, 274 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16