Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 133 53% 90.2 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 211 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 21.4 19% 20.8 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 18.3 18% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 52 65 67 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 360 Write 242 Mixed 225 SusWrite 56.4 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 28.8 104% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 35.1 32% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 102%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 72GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 54 65 67 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 70 Write 65 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 57 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 76%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 253GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 85 82 82 85 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 110 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 84.8 119% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 3,795 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	91x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	48x
A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples	43x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	80x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	29x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	28x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
S800 120GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,678 samples	8x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16