Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2550

Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2550 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU F45
Memory	0.2 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 33.3 27% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 43 8-Core 50 6% 46.5 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1107) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 1.13 1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 219GB free Firmware: 0307 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 68 50 65 80 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.5% Very poor	Read 79.4 Write 73 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 68.2 15% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 4.4 13% 4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 100%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB 3,473 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 13 14 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 14 10% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 512 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AMILO Pi 2550 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2550

CPU
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2550

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2550

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)