Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Mm-vision Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME B360M-K
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191011
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 08:52
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 239 76% 141 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 679 68% 555 Pts	64-Core 688 43% 688 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.8% Good	Lighting 84.7 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 68.3 69% 79.1 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 75.9 Splatting 74.4 71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 804 832 409 55 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1210 Write 887 Mixed 823 SusWrite 487 190% 852 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 59 210% 75.4 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 841 DQ Mixed 219 272% 463 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 209%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 298GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 59.7 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 60.3 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 1x16GB 1,910 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14.3 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	225x
Core i7-9700KFIntel $280Bench 97%, 32,736 samples	151x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	148x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	301x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	188x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	130x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	407x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	197x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	159x

RAM
CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 1x16GBCorsairBench 46%, 1,910 samples	349x
CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 2x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 1,112 samples	135x
CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 2x16GBCorsairBench 92%, 1,713 samples	96x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $500

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16