HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	38.3 GB free of 40.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110311
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 05:03
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 121 55% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 486 42% 360 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1312) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 201 196 199 190 186 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 231 Write 218 Mixed 206 SusWrite 195 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 24.2 86% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 195 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 124%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 179 167 162 169 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 170 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 170 106% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 160 161 169 171 165 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 158 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 165 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 100%
Mass Storage Device 8GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 125c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	5.24% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 5.8 Mixed 5 SusWrite 4.6 9% 8.55 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 2.2 96% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.24% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 18JSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 ID:85 9B CT102464BA160B.C16 ID:01 98 9965525-024.A00LF ID:85 9B CT102464BA160B.C16 74GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.3% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 16.5 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8.1 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16