Asus Z97I-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z97I-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 04:50
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 96.4 1-Core 133 2-Core 266 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 697 77% 605 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 37.8 26% 33.6 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 33.7 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,485 Write 7,104 Mixed 5,314 1,477% 6,634 MB/s	4K Read 663 4K Write 369 4K Mixed 434 1,756% 488 MB/s	DQ Read 1,330 DQ Write 994 DQ Mixed 1057 819% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
RHDM2DDHP8A2-N3C8 127GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free Firmware: N0815A SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 310 309 308 307 309 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 309 Mixed 293 SusWrite 309 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 43.4 145% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 195 173% 259 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 99%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 269GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 68 68 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 96 Write 88.1 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 67.5 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 69%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-60M0A0 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 239GB free, PID 020a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.5% Average	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 61 SusWrite 100 125% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 161 162 159 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 159 Write 160 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 161 193% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 66%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 496GB free, PID 020a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.7% Poor	Read 82 Write 58.2 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 12.7 64% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 27.7 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 27.7 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97I-PLUS Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z97I-PLUS - $200

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	233x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	102x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	51x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	66x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	63x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	40x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	27x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	32x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $658

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16