Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 02:42
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 856 76% 643 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 114 Parallax 105 82% 106 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 94.7 Splatting 100 79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,003 Write 1358 Mixed 566 287% 1,309 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 49.4 185% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 766 DQ Write 636 DQ Mixed 537 447% 646 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 68GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 82.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 82.4 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 185GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 131 134 138 139 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 93.5 Write 98.8 Mixed 61 SusWrite 136 71% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 173 176 177 177 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 128 Mixed 82 SusWrite 177 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB 478 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 11GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.89% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 28.7 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 1.1 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.4 89% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 36%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB 478 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 26GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 8.8 8.3 8.8 8.9 8 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 35 Write 16 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 8.7 17% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.7 175% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 26.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 21.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)